And no movie referencing.

  • Photonic@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    4 天前

    You’re reading too much into this…. It was a joke my man

    But yes, often times results in a certain subset of people are extrapolated to people at large. That is how nearly every study in humans is done.

    • Sidyctism II.@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 天前

      Oh dont worry i didnt actually think you believe that 90% of the world use AI. I just like to use flippant comments as a jumping-off point to provide actual numbers.

      This doesnt work. AI users arent a subset of non-AI users. Thats like doing a medicinal study for dick-hard-pills on a few men and upon discovering it a success, declaring: now every man, woman and child will have a hard dick at their leisure.

      • Photonic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        4 天前

        Well that’s because women usually don’t have a dick. That is a big difference (mileage may vary). And a reason to assume dick-medication wouldn’t work in them.

        I said there is no reason to assume non-AI users would behave differently. If you have a reason to assume non-AI users would behave differently you should state that reason. Now it’s just an empty statement of “that doesn’t work”.

          • Photonic@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            4 天前

            Yes, but non-AI users can become AI users. Women can’t become a fully biological man with XY chromosomes.

            Maybe you should look at it more like GLP-1 agonists. They work in obese and overweight people, but don’t cause much weight loss in normal-weight people. But there is no reason to assume they won’t work in people that are now of normal weight when they become overweight.