fixed

  • Damarus@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    3 小时前

    Unfortunately some pages have started blocking scrolling when the cookie banner is not closed properly. That can also be fixed with uBlock of course, but I encounter that specific problem quite often.

    • Tonava@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 小时前

      Some sites do those blocks very haphazardly and you can get past just removing couple html-lines, they don’t really care since most people won’t bother to look (or don’t know you can do it). At minimum it might just be “overflow: hidden” added on the top somewhere lmao. It’s a pain to do but if it’s something specific you need only once, might be worth to check

  • Gravitywell.xYz@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 小时前

    My setup is by default all cookies are session cookies unless manually changed.

    Unlock doesn’t really give that as an option but Vivaldi has it built in.

  • BeUnique@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    6 小时前

    That shit should be illegal. Accept all / reject all. That’s it. If somebody is disabling cookies, literally nobody in the entire world wants any of them! “Oh yeah, please, only keep my location data but not the data about my purchase decisions”…

    • WrathEnchanter@europe.pub
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 小时前

      I have good news for you: In the EU (which forced everyone to have the cookie-accept-banners in the first place) it IS illegal.

      • rmuk@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        2 小时前

        The EU didn’t force anyone to have the cookie banners. If the site only uses nessecary cookies - the kind you can’t turn off in the prompt - there doesn’t need to any prompts because that’s perfectly fine. The intrusive, obnoxious and deliberate confusing popups are from data harvesters throwing a tantrum because they can’t stalk you every waking second any more, and complying in the most malicious and disrespectful way they can.

        Cookie banners are nothing to do with the EU and everything to do with tech-bros.

        • WrathEnchanter@europe.pub
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 小时前

          I mean… The EU could’ve also said ‘no privacy invasive cookies’ instead of ‘cookie Banner if privacy invasive cookies’. I don’t think being able to disable is bad, I think they didn’t go far enough (and also of course datapeople only comply in the most malicious way possible. It’s literally their job, a job that shouldn’t exist.)

          • rmuk@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 小时前

            If the cookies are nessecary for the site to technically function, you don’t need to be promoted to accept. The law - which doesn’t even mention cookies - allows the absolute minimum amount of data required to provide a service to be gathered. For a website, that included cookies for storing preferences, shopping baskets, login tokens, etc.

            • Magnum, P.I.@infosec.pub
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              2 小时前

              But it must still inform you and give you the right to not use the service if you don’t want this form of collection happening, its just that you can’t use the service and refuse the bare minimum they need to operate.

  • Zink@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    8 小时前

    Yeah sure, give me whatever cookies aren’t already blocked. I love cookies. Is that all of them?

    (closes LibreWolf, which nukes everything except whitelisted sites)

    …pathetic.

  • flint@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    46
    ·
    17 小时前

    In my experience uBlock origin doesn’t really get rid of cookie consent banners/dark patterns. Damn good at bonking ads though.

    • zerozaku@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 小时前

      Also getting rid of cookie banners doesn’t mean the site won’t track with third party cookies. The cookies are ON by default and until you tell them to turn it OFF, they keep the cookies on.

        • nutbutter@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 小时前

          2nd panel means you have to do it again and again for every new website you visit, or if you clear cookies regularly. Using the ublock addon, you have to enable this setting once, and it is persistent across sessions.

      • underdawg@lm.kluge.cafe
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 小时前

        having too many filters slows down pages significantly, you should keep only those you actually need

    • autriyo@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      39
      ·
      18 小时前

      I want some of them to stay though, it wouldn’t be a huge hassle to not have them, but I’m a bit lazy…

      • Jay@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        16 小时前

        under settings,privacy and security, under cookies and site data (just above the “Clear cookies and site data every time you close Firefox” box) there’s “manage exceptions” that will exclude your favorites from getting erased every time.

      • StellarExtract@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        16 小时前

        The firefox extension “forget me not” allows you to fully control which cookies are retained, which are deleted, and how/when. It’s easy to customize individual sites on the fly. And it’s open source!
        Combined with “I still don’t care about cookies,” you almost never see or have to deal with another cookie consent banner.

      • Winter_Oven@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        16 小时前

        Pretty sure there is an “Allow” exception that you can use to keep cookies for the sites you want.

        (I think you) click on the shield in the URL bar, and a small window comes, which should have a small toggle that says “Keep cookies and site data”.

    • Kangae_Hishiryo@scribe.disroot.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      17 小时前

      Thanks, but not thanks, I don’t want to be logging in every site every single time I restart my browser; I just simply use AdNauseam with DandelionSprout lists (not all tho), NoCoin lists, the integrated lists, then I use Decentraleyes for not having to depend on external CDNs for almost anything, HaGeZi as my DNS provider, and OpenSnitch for system-wide interactive blocking of any suspicious domains or IPs…

      Oh, and hBlock, just to add a little more of paranoia, and ClamAV with Clamd and ClamOnAcc.

  • M1k3y@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    16 小时前

    Cookie autodelete works great together with Firefox containers. Then add I don’t care about cookies and the Internet becomes usable again.