• Proton VPN has hit back at Canada’s proposed Bill C-22
• The proposed legislation could require VPNs to log user metadata
• NordVPN and Windscribe have also slammed the bill
• Proton VPN has hit back at Canada’s proposed Bill C-22
• The proposed legislation could require VPNs to log user metadata
• NordVPN and Windscribe have also slammed the bill
if 3 lines is a long comment for you, you should read more. For the others:
Thank you for sounding the alarm about the untrustworthiness of this company. Keep on keeping on, my anarchist friend.
deleted by creator
name a VPN company that obstructed a federal court order
Mullvad
source? I have heard good things about Mullvad but I’m pretty sure they would not break laws
https://mullvad.net/en/help/how-we-handle-government-requests-user-data
https://mullvad.net/en/help/no-logging-data-policy
https://mullvad.net/en/blog/mullvad-vpn-was-subject-to-a-search-warrant-customer-data-not-compromised
sounds like they complied with the court orders? Proton also doesn’t log IPs, unless ordered by court. I’m willing to bet that if a court ordered Mullvad to start logging all traffic, they would comply, at least until they were able to move jurisdictions or something
Watch the Proton evangelist move the goalposts they set
from the start I asked for a company that obstructed court order. Show me where I moved goalposts
I’m holding a company to account for promising this.
So you thought this meant they would break the law? Nobody else expects that. There are more reasonable ways to interpret the messaging
Don’t be silly. You know Proton could do a lot to help people’s privacy before breaking the law.
And they already do. Their mail service is more private than the other options. It would help if you outlined what you want
https://youtu.be/xFKSKjyBVDU
You can’t just throw a 30 minute youtube link and expect people to watch it. At least give a gist of your point, and provide the video as extra context/depth.