The accusation was made by designer Ana Maria Restrepo Gutierrez, founder of the brand, who stated that in 2025, she had been contacted to develop embroidered napkins for the gala. According to the company, they spent several months working on samples and handcrafted details inspired by the event’s concept, but they never received payment or signed a formal contract.

  • Cosmonauticus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    edit-2
    8 days ago

    This is why I always felt the Devil Wears Prada blue sweater speech was a load of bullshit. Leaders in fashion problaby tell themselves they’re shaping culture but they’re more like leeches on the ass of society. The fashion industry REGULARLY steals styles, trends, and culture from the general population and converts it into something cheap and disposable while profiting off it. The fashion industry (especially high fashion) is nothing but a money suck that thrives on slave like labor while actively polluting the planet under the guise of sophistication, individuality, and quality.

    • NoForwadSlashS@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      8 days ago

      I don’t think they can claim AI when they previously contacted the artist about making that exact item and the final design they used ended up looking exactly like her design. Good old fashioned plagarism.

      • hitmyspot@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        8 days ago

        No, you see, when you use ai to steal from artists it’s not plagiarism. Rookie mistake. Of course when artists borrow from corporations, that’s stealing.