• Grandwolf319@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    Moving the goal post? Self driving has the word self in it, if anything I’m insisting on keeping the goal post.

    • BenevolentOne@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      2 days ago

      There are 70 drivers for 3000 vehicles. Which goal is good enough for you? We’ll make a note, I’ll tell you when we passed it, and you can tell me why it’s not real. I’m willing to wait.

      • Grandwolf319@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        I would have imagined self driving means 0 drivers

        It would also include all driving conditions

        For the record, I’m not saying that’s not impressive, I’m just going by the definition.

        I honestly thought we would have automated truck drivers by now, which imo is when shit really hits the fan.

        • BenevolentOne@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          The number of self-driving cars and trucks has been roughly doubling year over year, there are around 5000 right now.

          FWIW, I don’t think we will ever see safe in all driving conditions, there are plenty of driving conditions where it is fundamentally unsafe for cars and no man nor machine should be driving in them, so in your particular case, you get to wait for self driving cars for the rest of your life.

          I think in 5 years people will be complaining about a lack of available open-source and self-hosted self-driving cars, but safe in all weather? Probably not.