Deep@mander.xyz to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 4 个月前The New York Childrens Online Safety Act will ban anyone under 18 from chatting online.www.nysenate.govexternal-linkmessage-square24fedilinkarrow-up1144arrow-down18
arrow-up1136arrow-down1external-linkThe New York Childrens Online Safety Act will ban anyone under 18 from chatting online.www.nysenate.govDeep@mander.xyz to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 4 个月前message-square24fedilink
minus-squarequantumcrop@lemmy.todaylinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7arrow-down1·4 个月前So adults don’t have to verify their age right? Cuz it’s only for kids, right?
minus-squareFauxLiving@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5arrow-down3·4 个月前I hid the answer to your question in the text of the comment that you replied to.
minus-squareTiefkuehlkost@feddit.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4arrow-down1·4 个月前Im pretty shure that was a sarcastic rethorical question through and we all now the answer…
minus-squareFauxLiving@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down1·4 个月前Ah. Well, we shouldn’t look for details about the story in the comments, or by reading the headline. Often, as is the case here, the headline is misleading or completely wrong. This is a sarcastic rhetorical response but, like, in a chill vibes kinda way.
So adults don’t have to verify their age right? Cuz it’s only for kids, right?
I hid the answer to your question in the text of the comment that you replied to.
Im pretty shure that was a sarcastic rethorical question through and we all now the answer…
Ah. Well, we shouldn’t look for details about the story in the comments, or by reading the headline.
Often, as is the case here, the headline is misleading or completely wrong.
This is a sarcastic rhetorical response but, like, in a chill vibes kinda way.