• emmy67@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        20 hours ago

        Mostly because the problem is systemic, so the response should be as well. Your answer was individualistic.

        Individual change always places the blame on you. The real focus should be on the system that puts you under this pressure.

        • Don_alForno@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          20 hours ago

          It wasn’t my answer, but I’ll play the part.

          I agree with you in cases where individual change is hard, costly and has barely any influence on the big picture (like your “individual CO2 footprint”). But in this case the individual solution is to quit using a terrible browser and install a free extension in the new one, and it has all the impact it needs because it makes the problem go away. I can’t take anybody seriously who will willingly put themselves through youtube ads when they are this easily avoided.

          • emmy67@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            20 hours ago

            In your example you say reducing your individual CO2 print is hard. It’s not. It just has no real effect against the larger problem. The same thing is true here.

            And that’s why the ads will always exist and people will always complain about them. It also funds them to eventually find ways around your individual solutions.

            I guess answers like these misunderstand that you’re fighting a losing battle.

          • Ilovethebomb@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            19 hours ago

            I was hoping for some comments that realized not everyone wants to go to such lengths to avoid watching ads.

            Or that people use devices such as Chromecasts.

            • DisgruntledGorillaGang@reddthat.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              edit-2
              17 hours ago

              If you use a Google service on a locked down Google device, what magic fix are you hoping for? There are limits. If you’re unwilling to make any meaningful change, then unfortunately you’re out of luck and either need to suck it up and watch the ads, or pay Google for an ad-free experience. Or you can leave their ecosystem and be free.

            • XeroxCool@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              18 hours ago

              If there’s no solution to your device, then the only solution is a new device. At some point, it made sense for me to switch out my Chromecast (gen 1? puck) and go with a dedicated media pc. Now the Chromecast lives in the garage to stream music uninterrupted while I can still watch YouTube tutorials

                • XeroxCool@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  17 hours ago

                  Yes, but unfortunately, there’s not always an alternative left to use. If you can’t jump devices, then commercial breaks are just how it is. It’s one thing to complain that there’s no new workaround, but instead, you decried the platform for presenting the one (currently) reliable solution. That is why the platform is jumping on you.

        • Willdrick@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          edit-2
          19 hours ago

          Grayjay

          Edit: instead of making a snarky comment, I should probably do the right thing for fellow lemmings and explain:

          I’m fucking old and I’ve seen this before. It’s the same model as it was with TV and Cable. Air tv becomes so ad ridden than when Cable comes “ad free” we all start paying and switch over. A decade later the “base” cable TV plan is so ad ridden that they come up with “premium channels”, so you sign up for that so you can watch a movie without 10 minute ad break in the middle or 4 minute ad breaks on series. Then channels start splitting into “base” and “premium” versions (e.g. Discovery or History). Base channel is now just RealityTV garbage.

          I got fed up and started following creators on Google Video (then YouTube), Vimeo, listening to stuff on ShoutCast (that was winamp’s podcast/radio thing). Then Netflix comes out, decent service. Every other media company wants a piece of the pie. Slowly but surely every decent movie/series on Netflix gets moved to their respective production company’s service: disney, HBO, Paramount+… Netflix starts toying with ads, now disney…

          Slowly YT starts adding ads on the sidebar, then in the lower third, then pre-rolls. Now there’s “premium bitrate” behind a paywall. At some point I said “fuck it I’m not playing ball anymore”. Why pay premium? it’ll be the same as it’s always been. Soon enough “premium” yt will be the only way to watch over 360p quality, they’ll lower a bit the cost of YT Premium, ppl will jump in and down the road they’ll add ads back.

          I’d rather donate a buck to my favorite creators, it’ll be 100x more income that whatever they’d get off my views.