by writing articles like this they spark the wrong discussion.
extreme analogy, sorry to folks who don’t do analogies:
If there is a robber in a persons kitchen. Any discussion is a net negative for that homeowner.
why?
because the robbers presence alone is a violation of the sanctity of the home.
Any and all solutions, start with the robber not being in the kitchen.
Any and all discussion, adds _more time to the robber being in the kitchen
All of which is a net loss for the homeowner, and potential gain for the robber.
These type’s of horserace articles encourage a type of busywork discussions that waste time because they lead many of those readers away from thinking about the real / pertinent discussions to have.
by writing articles like this they spark the wrong discussion. extreme analogy, sorry to folks who don’t do analogies: If there is a robber in a persons kitchen. Any discussion is a net negative for that homeowner. why? because the robbers presence alone is a violation of the sanctity of the home. Any and all solutions, start with the robber not being in the kitchen. Any and all discussion, adds _more time to the robber being in the kitchen All of which is a net loss for the homeowner, and potential gain for the robber.
These type’s of horserace articles encourage a type of busywork discussions that waste time because they lead many of those readers away from thinking about the real / pertinent discussions to have.