The stupid/malicious dichotomy just keeps coming up with you, huh. How did you miss the explanations? Ditto for your original wrong comment.
Even if you think you are right, o arbiter of truth, apparently dozens of people disagree with your take when shown context. That’s on you bro. Go fix it.
Even if you think you are right, o arbiter of truth, apparently dozens of people disagree with your take when shown context. That’s on you bro. Go fix it.
You’re out here swinging on a straw man if you can’t restate what you think my position is, and have it be remotely accurate. Which, so far, you’re not even close.
Did I summarize your position well enough? Any clarifications?
Even if you think you are right, o arbiter of truth, apparently dozens of people disagree with your take when shown context. That’s on you bro. Go fix it.
lol you missed the duplicate the first time, yet another sign of your illiteracy. And you ignored it, typical of the belligerent hypocrite… But tell us, o wise one, what “authority” do you feel was appealed to?
Did not miss it just thought you were lazy, and I was right. You’ve never even heard of logical fallacies, have you?
Quick review: I fully understand your point, as demonstrated by you not correcting me, despite being repeatedly challenged to do so. You think you understand mine, but do not. And never have. Which is why you’re so full of yourself here. Again, laughably so.
You couldn’t argue your way out of a paper bag. Proof: this discussion. You don’t even know which way is up.
The stupid/malicious dichotomy just keeps coming up with you, huh. How did you miss the explanations? Ditto for your original wrong comment.
Even if you think you are right, o arbiter of truth, apparently dozens of people disagree with your take when shown context. That’s on you bro. Go fix it.
How can you be arguing with someone and not even know what their position is? No, none of your prior posts come close.
Naw, screw “know” - you’re fucking clueless. You have no idea and are screaming into the wind.
Even if you think you are right, o arbiter of truth, apparently dozens of people disagree with your take when shown context. That’s on you bro. Go fix it.
You’re out here swinging on a straw man if you can’t restate what you think my position is, and have it be remotely accurate. Which, so far, you’re not even close.
Did I summarize your position well enough? Any clarifications?
Wrong.
Even if you think you are right, o arbiter of truth, apparently dozens of people disagree with your take when shown context. That’s on you bro. Go fix it.
lol @ copy and paste. You’re committing a second logical fallacy: appeal to authority.
Still so wrong “bro”
lol you missed the duplicate the first time, yet another sign of your illiteracy. And you ignored it, typical of the belligerent hypocrite… But tell us, o wise one, what “authority” do you feel was appealed to?
Did not miss it just thought you were lazy, and I was right. You’ve never even heard of logical fallacies, have you?
Quick review: I fully understand your point, as demonstrated by you not correcting me, despite being repeatedly challenged to do so. You think you understand mine, but do not. And never have. Which is why you’re so full of yourself here. Again, laughably so.
You couldn’t argue your way out of a paper bag. Proof: this discussion. You don’t even know which way is up.
I do appreciate the fun though.
Wrong, I called you wrong already, you weird liar.
Your fault, even if I assume you might be right.
Genuinely, are you mentally well? I asked you what authority you think I’m appealing to. Am I speaking to a person or an LLM?