brianpeiris@lemmy.ca to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 7 个月前No AI* Here - A Response to Mozilla's Next Chapter - Waterfox Blogwww.waterfox.comexternal-linkmessage-square122fedilinkarrow-up1604arrow-down115cross-posted to: privacy@lemmy.mlfirefox@lemmy.ml
arrow-up1589arrow-down1external-linkNo AI* Here - A Response to Mozilla's Next Chapter - Waterfox Blogwww.waterfox.combrianpeiris@lemmy.ca to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 7 个月前message-square122fedilinkcross-posted to: privacy@lemmy.mlfirefox@lemmy.ml
minus-squareonehundredsixtynine@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down3·edit-24 个月前deleted by creator
minus-squareAllero@lemmy.todaylinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·7 个月前Interesting, though Goanna is still a Gecko fork.
minus-squarenyan@lemmy.cafelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·7 个月前It is, but it’s so divergent these days that 90% of Mozilla patches won’t even apply to the codebase (and presumably vice-versa). My conclusion is that Pale Moon and Goanna are capable of surviving if Firefox development ceases.
minus-squareyistdaj@pawb.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·edit-26 个月前Pale Moon is criticised precisely because its developers don’t have the resources to keep it fast, feature complete and secure.
deleted by creator
Interesting, though Goanna is still a Gecko fork.
It is, but it’s so divergent these days that 90% of Mozilla patches won’t even apply to the codebase (and presumably vice-versa). My conclusion is that Pale Moon and Goanna are capable of surviving if Firefox development ceases.
I see
Pale Moon is criticised precisely because its developers don’t have the resources to keep it fast, feature complete and secure.