Maybe not that interesting for everyone here, but I found no better community for this.

  • Uriel238 [all pronouns]@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    2 days ago

    The problem is when the contributors influence what the videos say, in contradiction to data.

    Kurzgesagt’s video on +2° / +3° / +4° over the global mean isn’t going to be so bad video was conspicuous to me, and is in fact, based on fossil-fuel industry rhetoric, rather than climatology estimations (which tell us over +1.5° is going to fuck us, and is).

        • CybranM@feddit.nu
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 hours ago

          “I’m going to watch half the movie then complain about it not making sense and having a bad ending”

          • Uriel238 [all pronouns]@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            5 hours ago

            It’s allegedly a documentary, not fiction. It should make sense from beginning to end.

            Sounds like you feel the need to defend Kurzgesagt for sentimental reasons, and since they’re presenting themselves as a source for accurate information, that just won’t do.

            • CybranM@feddit.nu
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              4 hours ago

              They link all their sources. So regardless of where their funding comes from I’d rather have a good source of information instead of a non-existent perfect source.