• ubergeek@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Except StarLink cannot possibly provide the same bandwidth, latency, and throughput a fiber connection can. Because of physics.

    I can either share my 10G symmetrical connection with nobody, or with 200 others.

    And, Fiber costs me $70 a month. Starlink, with worse performance, costs 4x more.

    • interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 minutes ago

      That’s good for Starlink and all other ISPs, intuitively, the less internet people have, the more they will pay for more, simple supply and demand !

      The best financial move for SpaceX and Starlink would be to have a few “unfortunate accidents” where tesla crash into telephone poles which happen to also hold critical fiber junctions.

      Now that is profit driven innovation !

      • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        35 minutes ago

        That’s the point. Musk wants control over the entire internet.

        If all the other internet infrastructure was abandoned, he would be the most powerful person in history. Want to regulate him afterwards? He could just shut down the internet in your region until you accept his terms.

    • HiTekRedNek@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      26 minutes ago

      TIL 120 is 4 x 70…

      Edit to add everything below this line

      Downvotes for facts. I pay 120/mo. It’s either this, 3Mbps DSL, or T-Mobile home 5G that works when it feels like it.