• nintendiator@feddit.cl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    In fact, files end up corrupted,

    Backup often and check the backups.

    data is improperly transferred

    Backup often.

    hard drives fail

    Backup often.

    formats change

    Use an open format. For extra sure, make sure it doesn’t carry DRM.

    work simply vanishes.

    Uuuuh don’t be corrupt?

    Like, really, it’s not like one’s asking too much.

    • AbidanYre@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      work simply vanishes.

      Uuuuh don’t be corrupt?

      Some of that could also be incompetence.

      • ilega_dh@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        What was it again? “Don’t attribute to malice when it can be attributed to stupidity” something something?

    • cm0002@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      Some executive somewhere:

      In fact, files end up corrupted,

      Backup often and check the backups.

      That costs $

      data is improperly transferred

      Backup often.

      That costs $

      hard drives fail

      Backup often.

      That costs $

      formats change

      Use an open format. For extra sure, make sure it doesn’t carry DRM.

      That costs $ (Probably, I’d ask IT but we laid them off as a cost reduction so meh )

      work simply vanishes.

      Uuuuh don’t be corrupt?

      That costs $

  • snooggums@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    Huh, I assumed they were spending the money to archive digital content with redundancy just like they did celluloid.

    • echo64@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      They aren’t spending the money to preserve film either. The best case is storing the film in salt mines, and that only slows the degradation. Film isn’t being digitally scanned unless there’s a uhd release to profit from it, and every week that it isn’t scanned, it degrades a little more

  • Snot Flickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    Funny how bittorrent solved this with a simple distributed hash algorithm…

    I guess fuck using what works, amirite?


    Pirates are unironically better digital stewards of content and history than media organizations.

    • SoleInvictus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      Seriously. If these “media pros” are actually concerned, it appears my personal server adheres to higher standards than their industry.

    • CosmicTurtle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      I wish there was a good way to store a backup of my media. I recently suffered a terrible hard drive issue. I lost a terabyte of media. Fortunately, the pirate ship has saved me and has me rethinking some of my backup methodologies.

      Outside of periodically backing up onto an external hard drive, I haven’t been able to find a reasonably priced online backup solution that isn’t going to fuck me when I have to pull data out. Egress fees are killer.

      • WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        All you need is to use ZFS or BTRFS locally to prevent master version bitrot and provide failover/redundancy, manually sync that to a separate “offline” HDD periodically, then setup a simple pi with tailscale + HDD at a family member or friends house, and rclone all your data to it (encrypted) as a cron job every night or week. This performs the function of a cloud provider (offsite backup); alternately, just manually sync the offline HDD once a month.

        With this approach you’re covered for accidental deletion, hard drive failures, bitrot, ransomware, and fire; possibly many natural disasters, depending how far away the offsite is.

        Then you can just keep your most important data E2E encrypted in 1 or 2 cloud storage providers.

      • Snot Flickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        It’s a lot of up front cost, but a NAS that is RAIDed with parity puts you in a pretty safe spot.

        The short explanation is you have at minimum three drives, and you “stripe and span” them. This is a setup called RAID 5 where, if any one of the three drives fails, it can be replaced with a similar-sized drive and the “parity bits” from the other two drives can rebuild the data on the third drive. Yes, this means you only have the effective space of only two out of the three drives. So say you had 3x4TB drives, you’d have a total of 8TB to work with, and one drive is the “parity” drive (although this is actually split among the drives, so if any one fails, it can be revived by the other two).

        However, in practice, the space lost is worth it for redundancy. It does mean an up-front cost in buying drives, a NAS enclosure (or using something like TrueNAS plus off the shelf parts to build your own), and includes the cost of physical maintenance and support (a Uninterruptible Power Supply to keep the hardware safe, for instance, on top of eventual maintenance of physical parts).

        The offers the cloud solutions seem cheap up-front, but they don’t buy you as much time as the one-time up-front cost of building your own NAS and maintaining it. I understand why people choose the cloud solutions, it’s much easier. But if you’re dedicated to this lifestyle, it’s something worth looking into, at the very least.

        • brygphilomena@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          Obligatory raid isn’t backup.

          While yes, this will protect you from a disk dieing if you monitor it enough to notice. But it doesn’t save you from a nas dieing. Maybe you could rebuild the array with similar hardware but that’s not a sure thing.

          • CosmicTurtle@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            8 months ago

            This exactly. NAS+RAID gives you a backup of your local media. It can account for one of your three copies and one of your storage mediums. But you still need something off site.

            So assuming you had a copy on your computer proper, it could work. Better than no backups.