I’m new as in this is my first day using lemmy. I don’t know anything about lemmy etiquette and don’t want to do anything bad
thanks and have an amazing day! also plz be kind :D
I’m new as in this is my first day using lemmy. I don’t know anything about lemmy etiquette and don’t want to do anything bad
thanks and have an amazing day! also plz be kind :D
You’re still running on the absolute fantasy that people ate rational, and you’re doing worse than nothing to help when you do.
Not helpful, with the modern tendency to hitlerian readings of… Everything
Valid, whatever you find helps, but don’t push it on others as if it will somehow safeguard truth.
No. I’m not running on a fantasy. I’m trying to bring into existence a world that doesn’t yet exist. I know that people aren’t rational, but if my mind can be changed by facts, they have to have some value.
Thwy have value operationally, not rhetorically. At least in theory.
Obviously I haven’t had a lot of luck deriving benefits from being right about things.
You’re talking about a current reality. I’m talking about normalizing a different future.
And you think this gets us that future how?
Why do people behave like this right now? Thats the first question and I don’t think you had even asked it.
People behave like this now for a lot of complicated reasons. For one, changing opinions hurts us (physiologically), so our brain tries to prevent it; that’s something that can be eased with exposure. Also, rich people and foreign interests have a vested interest in keeping people susceptible to misinformation, and greater media literacy is really the only tactic that can combat it.
But more importantly, the world we live in now isn’t the only world we ever have to live in. It’s going to change one way or another; why not take steps to make it change into something more like what we want to live in?
How is that last statement related to the topic?
Like, I’m not seeing connective tissue here.
You’re contending that sharing sources online won’t accomplish anything because people are resistant to changing their opinions. Yes, that’s currently true; and while I see a benefit in the current world to sharing sources, why not also imagine a world in which it actually does change opinions? There’s no physiological or psychological law that makes opinion change impossible. People can change because people do change, so why don’t we do what we can to make that more common?
But how does including sources make that world? How does it move from point A to point B?
You haven’t thought of that at all. You’re applying reasoning to positions you hold, not reasoning to reach positions.